Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/63854
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Some economics of mining taxation
Author: Ergas, H.
Harrison, M.
Pincus, J.
Citation: Economic Papers: a journal of applied economics and policy, 2010; 29(4):369-383
Publisher: Economic Society of Australia
Issue Date: 2010
ISSN: 0812-0439
1759-3441
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Henry Ergas, Mark Harrison and Jonathan Pincus
Abstract: We argue five main propositions. First, the choice between royalties and profit-based taxation involves an efficiency tradeoff, between diminished incentives to produce output on one hand, and diminished incentives to minimise costs on the other (as in Laffont and Tirole, 1993). So the Brown tax is indeed a tax, and one that reduces the incentive to mine. Next, the ex post Resource Super Profits Tax (RSPT) falls on quasi-rents as well as on rents, and therefore involves some expropriation. Third, there may be a case in favour of a retrospective RSPT or the like, but it has yet to be made persuasively. Fourth, the successor to the RSPT – the Minerals Resource Rent Tax (MRRT) – has many of the inefficiencies of the RSPT but adds some further serious inefficiencies of its own. Last, the value of revenues from taxes such as the RSPT and the MRRT is usually over-stated, as those revenues are highly risky. The failure to take account of the risky character of those income streams amounts to fiscal illusion and makes it more likely that unwise spending commitments will be made.
Keywords: rent
royalties
incentives
efficiency
risk
retrospectivity.
Rights: © 2011 The Economic Society of Australia
DOI: 10.1111/j.1759-3441.2010.00090.x
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-3441.2010.00090.x
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
Economics publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.