1. Adelaide Research & Scholarship
  2. Schools and Disciplines
  3. Business School
  4. Business School publications
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/64190
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVarzaly, J.-
dc.contributor.authorVillios, S.-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Company and Commercial Law Review, 2010; 21(2):63-67-
dc.identifier.issn0958-5214-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/64190-
dc.description.abstractThe case of Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Macdonald (No.11) illustrates the increasing standard of review that directors appear to be subject to in Australia. The case related to the restructuring of the James Hardie group of companies and subsequent announcements falsely suggesting the sufficiency of funds to pay out asbestos claimants. The implications for directors are discussed.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityJenifer Varzaly and Sylvia Papadimitriou-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSweet & Maxwell Ltd-
dc.rightsCopyright status unknown-
dc.titleJudicial reconsideration of the nature of directors' duties in Australia-
dc.typeJournal article-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidVillios, S. [0000-0002-1568-0550]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
Business School publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.