Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/65716
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKemp, C.en
dc.contributor.authorPerfors, A.en
dc.contributor.authorTenenbaum, J.en
dc.date.issued2006en
dc.identifier.citationProceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2006) / R. Sun and N. Miyake (eds.), 26-29 July, 2006; pp.417-422en
dc.identifier.isbn0976831821en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/65716-
dc.description.abstractInductive learning is impossible without overhypothe-ses, or constraints on the hypotheses considered by the learner. Some of these overhypotheses must be innate, but we suggest that hierarchical Bayesian models help explain how the rest can be acquired. The hierarchi-cal approach also addresses a common question about Bayesian models of cognition: where do the priors come from? To illustrate our claims, we consider two specific kinds of overhypotheses — overhypotheses about fea-ture variability (e.g. the shape bias in word learning) and overhypotheses about the grouping of categories into on-tological kinds like objects and substances.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityCharles Kemp, Amy Perfors and Joshua B. Tenenbaumen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherCognitive Science Societyen
dc.rights© the authorsen
dc.source.urihttp://csjarchive.cogsci.rpi.edu/Proceedings/2006/docs/p417.pdfen
dc.titleLearning overhypothesesen
dc.typeConference paperen
dc.contributor.conferenceAnnual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (28th : 2006 : Vancouver, Canada)en
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 5
Psychology publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_65716.pdfPublished version214.28 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.