Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/66022
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Effect of e-learning and repeated performance feedback on spirometry test quality in family practice: A cluster trial
Author: Schermer, T.
Akkermans, R.
Crockett, A.
Montfort, M.
Grootens-Stekelenburg, J.
Stout, J.
Pieters, W.
Citation: Annals of Family Medicine, 2011; 9(4):330-336
Publisher: Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
Issue Date: 2011
ISSN: 1544-1709
1544-1717
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Tjard R. Schermer, Reinier P. Akkermans, Alan J. Crockett, Marian van Montfort, Joke Grootens-Stekelenburg, Jim W. Stout and Willem Pieters
Abstract: PURPOSE Spirometry has become an indispensable tool in primary care to exclude, diagnose, and monitor chronic respiratory conditions, but the quality of spirometry tests in family practices is a reason for concern. Aim of this study was to investigate whether a combination of e-learning and bimonthly performance feedback would improve spirometry test quality in family practices in the course of 1 year. METHODS Our study was a cluster trial with 19 family practices allocated to intervention or control conditions through minimization. Intervention consisted of e-learning and bimonthly feedback reports to practice nurses. Control practices received only the joint baseline workshop. Spirometry quality was assessed by independent lung function technicians. Two outcomes were defined, with the difference between rates of tests with 2 acceptable and repeatable blows being the primary outcome and the difference between rates of tests with 2 acceptable blows being the secondary outcome. We used multilevel logistic regression analysis to calculate odds ratios (ORs) for an adequate test in intervention group practices. RESULTS We analyzed 1,135 tests. Rate of adequate tests was 33% in intervention and 30% in control group practices (OR = 1.3; P=.605). Adequacy of tests did not differ between groups but tended to increase with time: OR = 2.2 (P = .057) after 3 and OR = 2.0 (P = .086) in intervention group practices after 4 feedback reports. When ignoring test repeatability, these differences between the groups were slightly more pronounced: OR = 2.4 (P = .033) after 3 and OR=2.2 (P = .051) after 4 feedback reports. CONCLUSIONS In the course of 1 year, we observed a small and late effect of e-learning and repeated feedback on the quality of spirometry as performed by family practice nurses. This intervention does not seem to compensate the lack of rigorous training and experience in performing spirometry tests in most practices.
Keywords: Spirometry
respiratory function tests
family practice
primary health care
quality assurance, health care
randomized controlled trial
multicenter study
education
pulmonary disease, chronic obstructive
asthma
Rights: © 2011 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.
DOI: 10.1370/afm.1258
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1370/afm.1258
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 5
General Practice publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.