Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/70471
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Type: | Journal article |
Title: | Clinical audit on documentation of anticipatory "not for resuscitation" orders in a tertiary Australian teaching hospital |
Author: | Salins, Naveen S. Jansen, Wendy Irmgard |
Citation: | Indian Journal of Palliative Care, 2011; 17(1):42-46 |
Publisher: | Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd. |
Issue Date: | 2011 |
ISSN: | 0973-1075 |
School/Discipline: | School of Nursing |
Statement of Responsibility: | Naveen Sulakshan Salins and Wendy Jansen |
Abstract: | Aim: The purpose of this clinical audit was to determine how accurately documentation of anticipatory Not for Resuscitation (NFR) orders takes place in a major metropolitan teaching hospital of Australia. Materials and Methods: Retrospective hospital-based study. Independent case reviewers using a questionnaire designed to study NFR documentation reviewed documentation of NFR in 88 case records. Results: Prognosis was documented in only 40% of cases and palliative care was offered to two-third of patients with documented NFR. There was no documentation of the cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) process or outcomes of CPR in most of the cases. Only in less than 50% of cases studied there was documented evidence to suggest that the reason for NFR documentation was consistent with patient’s choices. Conclusion: Good discussion, unambiguous documentation and clinical supervision of NFR order ensure dignified and quality care to the dying. |
Keywords: | Audit; Documentation; Not for resuscitation |
Rights: | Copyright © Indian Journal of Palliative Care |
DOI: | 10.4103/0973-1075.78448 |
Appears in Collections: | Nursing publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.