Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/7055
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLindeman, G.-
dc.contributor.authorHiew, M.-
dc.contributor.authorVisvader, J.-
dc.contributor.authorLeary, J.-
dc.contributor.authorField, M.-
dc.contributor.authorGaff, C.-
dc.contributor.authorMcKinlay Gardner, R.-
dc.contributor.authorTrainor, K.-
dc.contributor.authorCheetham, G.-
dc.contributor.authorSuthers, G.-
dc.contributor.authorKirk, J.-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.citationBreast Cancer Research, 2004; 6(4):R401-R407-
dc.identifier.issn1465-5411-
dc.identifier.issn1465-542X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/7055-
dc.description© 2004 Lindeman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Germline mutations in the genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 account for only a proportion of hereditary breast cancer, suggesting that additional genes contribute to hereditary breast cancer. Recently a heterozygous variant in the ataxia–telangiectasia mutated (ATM) gene, IVS10-6T→G, was reported by an Australian multiple-case breast cancer family cohort study (the Kathleen Cuningham Foundation Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer) to confer a substantial breast cancer risk. Although this variant can result in a truncated ATM product, its clinical significance as a high-penetrance breast cancer allele or its role as a low-penetrance risk-modifier is controversial. METHODS: We determined the frequency of ATM IVS10-6T→G variants in a cohort of individuals affected by breast and/or ovarian cancer who underwent BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing at four major Australian familial cancer clinics. RESULTS: Seven of 495 patients (1.4%) were heterozygous for the IVS10-6T→G variant; the carrier rate in unselected Australian women with no family history of breast cancer is reported to be 6 of 725 (0.83%) (P = 0.4). Two of the seven probands also harboured a pathogenic BRCA1 mutation and one patient had a BRCA1 unclassified variant of uncertain significance. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that the ATM IVS10-6T→G variant does not seem to occur at a significantly higher frequency in affected individuals from high-risk families than in the general population. A role for this variant as a low-penetrance allele or as a modifying gene in association with other genes (such as BRCA1) remains possible. Routine testing for ATM IVS10-6T→G is not warranted in mutation screening of affected individuals from high-risk families.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityGeoffrey J Lindeman, Melody Hiew, Jane E Visvader, Jennifer Leary, Michael Field, Clara L Gaff, RJ McKinlay Gardner, Kevin Trainor, Glenice Cheetham, Graeme Suthers and Judy Kirk-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherBiomed Central Ltd-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr806-
dc.subjectATM-
dc.subjectBRCA1-
dc.subjectbreast cancer-
dc.subjecthereditary predisposition-
dc.subjectIVS10-6T→G-
dc.titleFrequency of the ATM IVS10-6T -> G variant in Australian multiple-case breast cancer families-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/bcr806-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
Paediatrics publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_7055.pdfPublished version111.55 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.