Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/71721
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBretag, T.-
dc.contributor.authorMahmud, S.-
dc.contributor.authorWallace, M.-
dc.contributor.authorWalker, R.-
dc.contributor.authorJames, C.-
dc.contributor.authorGreen, M.-
dc.contributor.authorEast, J.-
dc.contributor.authorMcGowan, U.-
dc.contributor.authorPartridge, L.-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationProceedings of the 5th Asia Pacific Conference on Educational Integrity, held at the University of Western Australia, 26-28 September, 2011: pp.21-29-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/71721-
dc.description.abstractThis paper reports on one important aspect of the preliminary findings from the Australian Learning and Teaching Council (ALTC) project, Academic integrity standards: Aligning policy and practice in Australian universities. Our project aims to identify approaches to the complex issues of academic integrity, and then to build on these approaches to develop exemplars for adaptation across the higher education sector. Based on analysis of publicly available online academic integrity policies at each of the 39 Australian universities, we have identified five core elements of exemplary academic integrity policy. These have been grouped under the headings, Access, Approach, Responsibility, Detail and Support, with no element given priority over another. In this paper we compare the five core elements identified in our research with best practice guidelines recommended by the Higher Education Academy (HEA) in the UK. We conclude that an exemplar policy needs to provide an upfront, consistent message, reiterated throughout the entire policy, which indicates a systemic and sustained commitment to the values of academic integrity and the practices that ensure it. Whereas the HEA created two discrete resources, the key aim and challenge of this project will be to develop exemplars that demonstrate a strong alignment between policy and practice.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityTracey Bretag, Saadia Mahmud, Margaret Wallace, Ruth Walker, Colin James, Margaret Green, Julianne East, Ursula McGowan and Lee Partridge-
dc.description.urihttp://www.apcei.catl.uwa.edu.au/procs-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherUniSA-
dc.rightsCopyright: Copyright 2011 in individual articles or abstracts resides with the authors of the item. Authors of items have assigned to 5APCEI and not for profit educational institutions a non-exclusive, royalty free licence to reproduce articles for personal use or for institutional teaching and learning purposes, in any format, provided that the article is used and cited in accordance with the usual academic conventions.-
dc.subjectAcademic integrity-
dc.subjectacademic integrity policy-
dc.subjecthigher education-
dc.titleCore elements of exemplary academic integrity policy in Australian higher education-
dc.typeConference paper-
dc.contributor.conferenceAsia Pacific Conference on Educational Integrity (5th : 2011 : Western Australia)-
dc.publisher.placeAustralia-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidMcGowan, U. [0000-0002-8214-8599]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
Education publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.