Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/73113
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMeglecz, E.-
dc.contributor.authorNeve, G.-
dc.contributor.authorBiffin, E.-
dc.contributor.authorGardner, M.-
dc.contributor.editorCordaux, R.-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationPLoS One, 2012; 7(7):1-15-
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203-
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/73113-
dc.description.abstractMicrosatellites are ubiquitous in Eukaryotic genomes. A more complete understanding of their origin and spread can be gained from a comparison of their distribution within a phylogenetic context. Although information for model species is accumulating rapidly, it is insufficient due to a lack of species depth, thus intragroup variation is necessarily ignored. As such, apparent differences between groups may be overinflated and generalizations cannot be inferred until an analysis of the variation that exists within groups has been conducted. In this study, we examined microsatellite coverage and motif patterns from 454 shotgun sequences of 154 Eukaryote species from eight distantly related phyla (Cnidaria, Arthropoda, Onychophora, Bryozoa, Mollusca, Echinodermata, Chordata and Streptophyta) to test if a consistent phylogenetic pattern emerges from the microsatellite composition of these species. It is clear from our results that data from model species provide incomplete information regarding the existing microsatellite variability within the Eukaryotes. A very strong heterogeneity of microsatellite composition was found within most phyla, classes and even orders. Autocorrelation analyses indicated that while microsatellite contents of species within clades more recent than 200 Mya tend to be similar, the autocorrelation breaks down and becomes negative or non-significant with increasing divergence time. Therefore, the age of the taxon seems to be a primary factor in degrading the phylogenetic pattern present among related groups. The most recent classes or orders of Chordates still retain the pattern of their common ancestor. However, within older groups, such as classes of Arthropods, the phylogenetic pattern has been scrambled by the long independent evolution of the lineages.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityEmese Meglécz, Gabriel Nève, Ed Biffin and Michael G. Gardner-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science-
dc.rightsCopyright: © 2012 Meglécz et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040861-
dc.subjectAnimals-
dc.subjectPlants-
dc.subjectSequence Analysis, DNA-
dc.subjectPhylogeny-
dc.subjectSpecies Specificity-
dc.subjectBase Sequence-
dc.subjectRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid-
dc.subjectMicrosatellite Repeats-
dc.subjectModels, Biological-
dc.subjectEukaryota-
dc.subjectNucleotide Motifs-
dc.titleBreakdown of phylogenetic signal: a survey of microsatellite densities in 454 shotgun sequences from 154 non model Eukaryote species-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0040861-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 5
Earth and Environmental Sciences publications
Environment Institute publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_73113.pdfPublished version2.1 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.