1. Adelaide Research & Scholarship
  2. Schools and Disciplines
  3. School of Economics
  4. Economics publications
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/73619
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLin, F.-
dc.contributor.authorSim, N.-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationEconomics Letters, 2012; 116(2):225-228-
dc.identifier.issn0165-1765-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/73619-
dc.description.abstractDespite the onset of globalization, year-by-year cross-country regressions of the gravity model usually suggest that the impediment of geographical distance on bilateral trade is rising, and not declining, over time. This effect of distance is dubbed the distance puzzle. In this paper, we argue that . prima facie evidence of the distance effect from the year-by-year regressions may not be a good indicator of the true impact of distance on trade. © 2012 Elsevier B.V.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityFaqin Lin and Nicholas C.S. Sim-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherElsevier Science SA-
dc.rights© 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.03.004-
dc.titleDeath of distance and the distance puzzle-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.econlet.2012.03.004-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 5
Economics publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
RA_hdl_73619.pdf
  Restricted Access		Restricted Access599.85 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.