Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/74425
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNettelbeck, A.-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationAustralian Historical Studies, 2012; 43(3):396-411-
dc.identifier.issn1031-461X-
dc.identifier.issn1940-5049-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/74425-
dc.description.abstractScholarship on Australia's colonial protectorates has examined the ways in which protectors largely failed in their humanitarian mission, as well as the ambivalent roles they played as agents of ‘civilisation’. Yet as well as representing ‘friends and benefactors’ of Aboriginal people, colonial protectors worked to bring them within the legal reach of police, courts and prisons. This article will compare the work of the protectorates during the 1840s in Port Phillip and South Australia with that of Western Australia, where a more systematic and forebodingly modern policy of Aboriginal governance existed. It argues that in Western Australia a logic of Aboriginal protection emerged through a principle of discipline and punishment facilitated by the distinctive policy regime of Governor Hutt.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityAmanda Nettelbeck-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherUniv Melbourne-
dc.rightsCopyright status unknown-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1031461x.2012.706621-
dc.title'A Halo of Protection': colonial protectors and the principle of aboriginal protection through punishment-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/1031461X.2012.706621-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidNettelbeck, A. [0000-0001-7099-6075]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 4
History publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
RA_hdl_74425.pdf
  Restricted Access
Restricted Access141.95 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.