Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/76388
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFox, S.-
dc.contributor.authorKumarasinghe, M.-
dc.contributor.authorArmes, J.-
dc.contributor.authorBilous, M.-
dc.contributor.authorCummings, M.-
dc.contributor.authorFarshid, G.-
dc.contributor.authorFitzpatrick, N.-
dc.contributor.authorFrancis, G.-
dc.contributor.authorMcCloud, P.-
dc.contributor.authorRaymond, W.-
dc.contributor.authorMorey, A.-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal of Surgical Pathology, 2012; 36(4):577-582-
dc.identifier.issn0147-5185-
dc.identifier.issn1532-0979-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/76388-
dc.description.abstractrastuzumab provides a survival benefit in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-amplified/overexpressed advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers (GC/GJCs). However, the optimal method for testing is unclear. The aim of this study was to assess interlaboratory agreement on HER2 scoring in GC/GJC to aid the development of a robust testing algorithm for diagnostic practice in Australia. Nine laboratories assessed the HER2 status of 100 GC/GJC tissue samples by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH) [chromogenic (CISH) or silver (SISH)] using both HER2 copy number and HER2:chr17 (chromosome 17) ratio. Results were compared with reference fluorescence ISH (FISH). Interlaboratory agreement on IHC3+ scoring was good ([kappa]=0.76), and there was good/very good agreement between IHC (positivity defined as IHC3+) and ISH when HER2 copy number was used ([kappa]=0.72 to 0.87). Agreement on CISH/SISH scoring was good/very good when HER2 copy number was used ([kappa]=0.68 to 0.86), and agreement between CISH/SISH and FISH using HER2 copy number was very good ([kappa]=0.88 to 0.91). Agreement was reduced when HER2:chr17 ratio was used. The good agreement for HER2 copy number determined by bright-field ISH suggests that this is the optimal method for testing in GC/GJC cases. An IHC3+ score was strongly predictive of a positive ISH result, although agreement for all IHC scores was only moderate, suggesting that IHC triage before ISH testing would be the most cost-effective strategy. However, because of the unique features of GC/GJC samples and the difficulty of ensuring consistent HER2 staining in the community setting, it is recommended that HER2 status in advanced GC/GJC be determined by both IHC and ISH in the same laboratory.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityStephen B. Fox, Marian Priyanthi Kumarasinghe, Jane E. Armes, Michael Bilous, Margaret C. Cummings, Gelareh Farshid, Nicole Fitzpatrick, Philip I. McCloud, Wendy Ann Raymond and Adrienne Morey-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins-
dc.rights© 2012 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pas.0b013e318244adbb-
dc.subjectHER2-
dc.subjectimmunohistochemistry-
dc.subjectin situ hybridization-
dc.subjectgastric cancer-
dc.subjecttrastuzumab-
dc.titleGastric HER2 Testing Study (GaTHER): An Evaluation of Gastric/Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer Testing Accuracy in Australia-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/PAS.0b013e318244adbb-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidFarshid, G. [0000-0002-2056-0561]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
Pathology publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.