Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/76689
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCoggins, Jeremy Keithen
dc.contributor.authorDonohoe, Steveen
dc.date.issued2012en
dc.identifier.citationInternational Construction Law Review, 2012; 29(2):195-230en
dc.identifier.issn0265-1416en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/76689-
dc.description.abstractSeveral Commonwealth jurisdictions have introduced construction industry payment legislation over the past 13 years. Whilst all the legislation has the common objective of improving cash flow within the construction industry and shares key conceptual provisions, there are many differences between the various Acts. In Australia, due to the enactment of eight separate and differing Acts, the issue of national harmonisation has become topical. By carrying out a comprehensive comparative review of the key differences between the legislation internationally and considering the performance of the Australian legislation to date, this paper attempts to enhance a legislative model for Australian harmonisation which was first proposed by one of the authors earlier in 2011.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityJeremy Coggins, Steve Donohoeen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherInforma UK Ltden
dc.rightsCopyright status unknownen
dc.titleA comparative review of international construction industry payment legislation, and observations from the Australian experienceen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.schoolLaw Schoolen
Appears in Collections:Law publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.