Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/77637
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDuncan, A.-
dc.contributor.authorTurnbull, D.-
dc.contributor.authorGregory, T.-
dc.contributor.authorCole, S.-
dc.contributor.authorYoung, G.-
dc.contributor.authorFlight, I.-
dc.contributor.authorWilson, C.-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationHealth Promotion Journal of Australia, 2012; 23(2):122-128-
dc.identifier.issn1036-1073-
dc.identifier.issn2201-1617-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/77637-
dc.description.abstractISSUE ADDRESSED: This study used the Transtheoretical Model of Behaviour Change (TTM) to describe reparticipation in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening according to social cognitive and background variables. METHODS: A random sample of men and women aged 50-74 years living in South Australia completed a questionnaire measuring TTM stage and attitudes toward screening using a faecal occult blood test (FOBT). Participants were categorised according to four stages of readiness to rescreen: action, maintenance, relapse and inconsistent. Multivariate techniques were used to determine predictors of lower readiness stages compared with maintenance. RESULTS: Of the 849 study participants, 29.9% were either non-adherent or had no intentions to maintain adherence (inconsistent and relapse). Compared with maintenance rescreeners, relapse participants reported less: social influences to screen (RR=0.86, p<0.001); satisfaction with prior screening (RR=0.87, p=0.03), self-efficacy (RR=0.96, p=0.01); and screening benefits (RR=0.84, p<0.001). Relapse participants were also more likely to not have private health insurance (RR=1.33, p=0.04) and be unaware of the need to repeat screening (RR=1.41, p=0.02). Inconsistent screeners were less likely to have planned when they will next rescreen (RR= 0.84, p=0.04) and reported greater barriers to rescreening (RR=1.05, p=0.05). Action participants were younger (RR= 0.98, p=<0.001), reported less social influences to screen (RR=0.94, p<0.001) and were less likely to have known someone who has had CRC (RR=0.82, p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Social cognitive, demographic and background variables significantly differentiated screening maintenance from lower readiness stages.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityAmy Duncan, Deborah Turnbull, Tess Gregory, Stephen R. Cole, Graeme P. Young, Ingrid Flight and Carlene Wilson-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherAustralian Health Promotion Association-
dc.rightsCopyright © 2012 Australian Health Promotion Association. All Rights Reserved.-
dc.source.urihttp://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=786822719059360;res=IELHEA-
dc.subjectColon cancer-
dc.subjectpsychotherapy-
dc.subjecthealth behaviour-
dc.subjectblood analysis-
dc.subjecthealth promotion-
dc.titleUsing the transtheoretical model of behaviour change to describe readiness to rescreen for colorectal cancer with faecal occult blood testing-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1071/he12122-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidTurnbull, D. [0000-0002-7116-7073]-
dc.identifier.orcidGregory, T. [0000-0003-4799-6258]-
dc.identifier.orcidWilson, C. [0000-0002-1883-4690]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
Psychology publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.