Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/80203
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Pakmehr, S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Petersen, R. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Quinlivan, J. | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2013; 53(1):46-50 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0004-8666 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1479-828X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/80203 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <h4>Objectives</h4>To explore factors that led to noncompliance with the 4-h rule for gynaecology patients in a general emergency department.<h4>Methods</h4>A cross-sectional cohort study was performed at a general emergency department. The files of all female patients aged from birth to 100 years presenting from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2010 were screened. Those patient's files where a coded gynaecological diagnosis was made were reviewed. A time flow analysis was then undertaken of 580 consecutive files to evaluate barriers to admission or discharge of patients within the 4-h period. A further 300 files were audited to determine whether suboptimal management by emergency department staff contributed towards delays.<h4>Results</h4>There were 134 438 presentations to the emergency department, of which 2968 were gynaecology presentations (2.2%). The overall compliance with the 4-h rule was 66%. Patients with acute triage status, who were pregnant or who were eventually admitted, were more likely to be managed in compliance with the 4-h rule. The main barriers to compliance were incomplete examinations by emergency department staff; waiting for ultrasound examinations and blood test results; delays waiting for specialty review; and delays caused by initial review by surgical teams.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Specific barriers to compliance with the 4-h rule can be identified in gynaecology patients. Strategies specific to overcome these barriers can be developed to improve compliance. | - |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Sahar Pakmehr, Rodney W. Petersen and Julie A. Quinlivan | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Publishing Asia | - |
dc.rights | © 2012 The Authors | - |
dc.source.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12025 | - |
dc.subject | 4-h rule | - |
dc.subject | compliance | - |
dc.subject | delays for care | - |
dc.subject | emergency | - |
dc.subject | gynaecology | - |
dc.title | Barriers to the 4-h rule: what causes delays for gynaecology patients in the emergency department? | - |
dc.type | Journal article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/ajo.12025 | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 4 Obstetrics and Gynaecology publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.