Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/80769
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Healthcare providers' knowledge, experience and challenges of reporting adverse events following immunisation: a qualitative study
Author: Parrella, A.
Braunack-Mayer, A.
Gold, M.
Marshall, H.
Baghurst, P.
Citation: BMC Health Services Research, 2013; 13(313):1-12
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd.
Issue Date: 2013
ISSN: 1472-6963
1472-6963
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Adriana Parrella, Annette Braunack-Mayer, Michael Gold, Helen Marshall and Peter Baghurst
Abstract: Background: Healthcare provider spontaneous reporting of suspected adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) is central to monitoring post-licensure vaccine safety, but little is known about how healthcare professionals recognise and report to surveillance systems. The aim of this study was explore the knowledge, experience and attitudes of medical and nursing professionals towards detecting and reporting AEFI. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study, using semi-structured, face to face interviews with 13 Paediatric Emergency Department consultants from a tertiary paediatric hospital, 10 General Practitioners, 2 local council immunisation and 4 General Practice nurses, recruited using purposive sampling in Adelaide, South Australia, between December 2010 and September 2011. We identified emergent themes related to previous experience of an AEFI in practice, awareness and experience of AEFI reporting, factors that would facilitate or impede reporting and previous training in vaccine safety. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. Results: AEFI reporting was infrequent across all groups, despite most participants having reviewed an AEFI. We found confusion about how to report an AEFI and variability, according to the provider group, as to the type of events that would constitute a reportable AEFI. Participants’ interpretation of a “serious” or “unexpected” AEFI varied across the three groups. Common barriers to reporting included time constraints and unsatisfactory reporting processes. Nurses were more likely to have received formal training in vaccine safety and reporting than medical practitioners. Conclusions: This study provides an overview of experience and beliefs of three healthcare professional groups in relation to identifying and reporting AEFI. The qualitative assessment reveals differences in experience and awareness of AEFI reporting across the three professional groups. Most participants appreciated the importance of their role in AEFI surveillance and monitoring the ongoing safety of vaccines. Future initiatives to improve education, such as increased training to health care providers, particularly, medical professionals, are required and should be included in both undergraduate curricula and ongoing, professional development.
Keywords: Adverse event following immunisation (AEFI), Surveillance
Healthcare provider
Reporting
Qualitative
Rights: © 2013 Parrella et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-313
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-313
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
Paediatrics publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_80769.pdfPublished version219.35 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.