Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/81262
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Comparison of mailed invitation strategies to improve fecal occult blood test participation in men: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Author: Duncan, A.
Zajac, I.
Flight, I.
Stewart, B.
Wilson, C.
Turnbull, D.
Citation: Trials, 2013; 14(1):239-1-239-9
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd.
Issue Date: 2013
ISSN: 1745-6215
1745-6215
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Amy Duncan, Ian Zajac, Ingrid Flight, Benjamin JR Stewart, Carlene Wilson and Deborah Turnbull
Abstract: BACKGROUND Men have a significantly increased risk of being diagnosed with, and dying from, colorectal cancer (CRC) than women. Men also participate in fecal occult blood test (FOBT) screening at a lower rate than women. This study will determine whether strategies that target men’s attitudes toward screening, and matched to stage of readiness to screen, increase men’s FOBT participation compared to a standard approach. METHODS/DESIGN Eligible trial participants will be a national sample of 9,200 men aged 50 to 74 years, living in urban Australia and randomly selected from the Australian electoral roll. Trial participants will be mailed an advance notification letter, followed 2 weeks later by an invitation letter and a free fecal immunochemical test (FIT) kit. The intervention is a factorial design, randomized controlled trial (RCT) with four trial arms, including a control. The content of the advance notification and invitation letters will differ by trial arm as follows: 1) standard advance notification and standard invitation (control arm); 2) targeted advance notification and standard invitation; 3) standard advance notification and targeted invitation; and 4) targeted advance notification and targeted invitation. The standard letters will replicate as closely as possible the letters included in the Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP). Modified advance notification and invitation letters will incorporate additional messages to target men in the precontemplation (advance notification) and contemplation stages (invitation). The primary outcome is return of the completed FIT within 12 weeks of invitation. Analysts will be blinded to trial assignment and participants will be blinded to the use of varying invitational materials. Subsamples from each trial arm will complete baseline and endpoint surveys to measure the psychological impact of the intervention, and qualitative interviews will be conducted to evaluate attitudes toward the intervention. DISCUSSION The outcomes of this study will have implications for the way FOBT screening is offered to men. Findings will help to identify how invitations for men to screen should be framed and delivered in order to maximize participation. TRIAL registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12612001122842
Keywords: Colorectal neoplasm
Male
Mass screening methods
Protocol
Psychological factors
Randomized controlled trial
Rights: © 2013 Duncan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-239
Grant ID: http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1026510
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-239
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 4
Psychology publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_81262.pdfPublished version275.72 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.