Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/81875
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Type: | Journal article |
Title: | The ecological footprint remains a misleading metric of global sustainability |
Author: | Blomqvist, L. Brook, B. Ellis, E. Kareiva, P. Nordhaus, T. Shellenberger, M. |
Citation: | PLoS Biology, 2013; 11(11):1-1 |
Publisher: | Public Library of Science |
Issue Date: | 2013 |
ISSN: | 1544-9173 1545-7885 |
Editor: | Mace, G.M. |
Organisation: | Environment Institute |
Statement of Responsibility: | Linus Blomqvist, Barry W. Brook, Erle C. Ellis, Peter M. Kareiva, Ted Nordhaus, Michael Shellenberger |
Abstract: | In this Formal Comment, Blomqvist et al. note that the main points of their Perspective, “Does the Shoe Fit? Real versus Imagined Ecological Footprints,” are robust to Rees and Wackernagel's response, “The Shoe Fits, but the Footprint is Larger than Earth.” |
Keywords: | Humans Conservation of Energy Resources |
Rights: | © 2013 Blomqvist et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001702 |
Published version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001702 |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest Environment Institute Leaders publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
hdl_81875.pdf | Published version | 196.94 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.