1. Adelaide Research & Scholarship
  2. Schools and Disciplines
  3. School of Humanities
  4. Philosophy
  5. Philosophy publications
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/82189
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMortensen, C.-
dc.contributor.authorLeishman, S.-
dc.contributor.authorQuigley, P.-
dc.contributor.authorHelke, T.-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of Aesthetics, 2013; 53(4):425-441-
dc.identifier.issn0007-0904-
dc.identifier.issn1468-2842-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/82189-
dc.description.abstractIn this article we address the question of how many impossible images Escher produced. To answer requires us first to clarify a range of concepts, including content, ambiguity, illusion, and impossibility. We then consider, and reject, several candidates for impossibility before settling on an answer. © 2013 British Society of Aesthetics.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityChris Mortensen, Steve Leishman, Peter Quigley, and Theresa Helke-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherOxford Univ Press-
dc.rights© British Society of Aesthetics 2013-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayt016-
dc.titleHow many impossible images did Escher produce?-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/aesthj/ayt016-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidMortensen, C. [0009-0001-3942-2126]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 4
Philosophy publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
RA_hdl_82189.pdf
  Restricted Access		Restricted Access954.15 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.