Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/82297
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSmithers, L.-
dc.contributor.authorChittleborough, C.-
dc.contributor.authorStocks, N.-
dc.contributor.authorSawyer, M.-
dc.contributor.authorLynch, J.-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationMaternal and Child Health Journal, 2013; 18(6):1345-1353-
dc.identifier.issn1092-7875-
dc.identifier.issn1573-6628-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/82297-
dc.description.abstractTo examine whether items comprising a preschool well-child check for use by family doctors in Australia with 4–5-year old children predicts health and academic outcomes at 6–7 years. The well-child check includes mandatory (anthropometry, eye/vision, ear/hearing, dental, toileting, allergy problems) and non-mandatory (processed food consumption, low physical activity, motor, behaviour/mood problems) items. The predictive validity of mandatory and non-mandatory items measured at 4–5 years was examined using data from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children. Outcomes at 6–7 years included overweight/obesity, asthma, health care/medication needs, general health, mental health problems, quality of life, teacher-reported mathematics and literacy ability (n = 2,280–2,787). Weight or height >90th centile at 4–5 years predicted overweight/obesity at 6–7 years with 60 % sensitivity, 79 % specificity and 40 % positive predictive value (PPV). Mood/behaviour problems at 4–5 predicted mental health problems at 6–7 years with 86 % sensitivity, 40 % specificity and 8 % PPV. Non-mandatory items improved the discrimination between children with and without mental health problems at 6–7 years (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.75 compared with 0.69 for mandatory items only), but was weak for most outcomes. Items used in a well-child health check were moderate predictors of overweight/obesity and mental health problems at 6–7 years, but poor predictors of other health and academic outcomes.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityLisa G. Smithers, Catherine R. Chittleborough, Nigel Stocks, Michael G. Sawyer, John W. Lynch-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSpringer New York LLC-
dc.rights© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-013-1369-8-
dc.subjectScreening-
dc.subjectChild health-
dc.subjectObesity-
dc.subjectMental health problems-
dc.subjectPredictive validity-
dc.titleCan items used in 4-year-old well-child visits predict children's health and school outcomes?-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10995-013-1369-8-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidSmithers, L. [0000-0002-6585-7836]-
dc.identifier.orcidChittleborough, C. [0000-0003-3196-7137]-
dc.identifier.orcidStocks, N. [0000-0002-9018-0361]-
dc.identifier.orcidSawyer, M. [0000-0002-7834-0561]-
dc.identifier.orcidLynch, J. [0000-0003-2781-7902]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 4
Paediatrics publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.