Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/8240
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of ScienceĀ® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Bolte, A. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Dekker, G. | - |
dc.contributor.author | van Eyck, J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | van Schijndel, R. | - |
dc.contributor.author | van Geijn, H. | - |
dc.date.issued | 2000 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Hypertension in Pregnancy, 2000; 19(3):261-271 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1064-1955 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1525-6065 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/8240 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <h4>Objective</h4>To establish if agreement exists between central venous pressure (CVP) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) measurements in severe hypertension in pregnancy as analyzed by tests of bias, precision, and 95% limits of agreement.<h4>Methods</h4>In a prospective study, CVP and PCWP data in 30 patients were collected by means of a pulmonary artery catheter from initiation of therapy until delivery. Patients with a diastolic blood pressure of more than 110 mm Hg were included. Correlation and agreement between CVP and PCWP before and after treatment were evaluated.<h4>Results</h4>The correlation coefficient (r) for CVP-PCWP data in 30 untreated patients was r = 0.64 (p = 0.0002) and for 256 pairs of posttreatment data, it was r = 0.53 (p < 0.0001). Linear regression and correlation for each individual patient in 29 patients with more than 3 measurements showed a significant correlation (p < 0.05) in 19 patients (66%). Correlation was poor (p > 0.05) in 10 patients (34%). The mean difference between PCWP and CVP was 3.5 +/- 2.6 mm Hg (limits of agreement: -1.6 to 8.7) in untreated patients. The mean difference between PCWP and CVP for 256 pairs of data derived posttreatment was 4.9 +/- 3.8 mm Hg (limits of agreement: -2.7 to 12. 5).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Invasive measurements of CVP and PCWP were found to agree poorly. Until a reliable noninvasive method is available to measure left ventricular preload, PCWP is the measurement of choice when invasive hemodynamic monitoring is necessary in patients with severe preeclampsia. | - |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Antoinette C. Bolte, Gustaaf A. Dekker, Jim van Eyck, Rob Strack van Schijndel, and Herman P. van Geijn | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Marcel Dekker Inc | - |
dc.source.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/prg-100101987 | - |
dc.subject | Humans | - |
dc.subject | Pre-Eclampsia | - |
dc.subject | Succinates | - |
dc.subject | Gelatin | - |
dc.subject | Monitoring, Physiologic | - |
dc.subject | Linear Models | - |
dc.subject | Sensitivity and Specificity | - |
dc.subject | Prospective Studies | - |
dc.subject | Pregnancy | - |
dc.subject | Blood Pressure | - |
dc.subject | Pulmonary Wedge Pressure | - |
dc.subject | Central Venous Pressure | - |
dc.subject | Diastole | - |
dc.subject | Female | - |
dc.subject | Bias | - |
dc.title | Lack of agreement between central venous pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure in preeclampsia | - |
dc.type | Journal article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1081/PRG-100101987 | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | Dekker, G. [0000-0002-7362-6683] | - |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 4 Obstetrics and Gynaecology publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.