Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/8335
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDekker, G.-
dc.contributor.authorRobillard, P.-
dc.date.issued2003-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Reproductive Immunology, 2003; 59(2):245-251-
dc.identifier.issn0165-0378-
dc.identifier.issn1872-7603-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/8335-
dc.descriptionCopyright © 2003 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.-
dc.description.abstractRecent Norwegian data suggest the presence of a causal relationship between prolonged birth intervals and the risk for preeclampsia in subsequent pregnancies. It has been proposed that the birth interval data explain the known association between a change in paternity and the risk for preeclampsia. In this review, the authors explore alternative explanations for the Norwegian findings, and as such argue that there is currently no reason to reject the primipaternity hypothesis.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityGus Dekker, and Pierre-Yves Robillard-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherElsevier Sci Ireland Ltd-
dc.source.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01650378-
dc.subjectBirth interval hypothesis-
dc.subjectPrimipaternity hypothesis-
dc.subjectPreeclampsia-
dc.titleThe birth interval hypothesis - does it really indicate the end of the primipaternity hypothesis-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0165-0378(03)00051-2-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidDekker, G. [0000-0002-7362-6683]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
Obstetrics and Gynaecology publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.