Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/85181
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Pancreaticoduodenectomy: outcomes in a low-volume, specialised Hepato Pancreato Biliary unit
Author: Kanhere, H.
Trochsler, M.
Kanhere, M.
Lord, A.
Maddern, G.
Citation: World Journal of Surgery, 2014; 38(6):1484-1490
Publisher: Springer
Issue Date: 2014
ISSN: 0364-2313
1432-2323
Statement of
Responsibility: 
H. A. Kanhere, M. I. Trochsler, M. H. Kanhere, A. N. Lord, G. J. Maddern
Abstract: Background This study was designed to evaluate the outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) at a low-volume specialised Hepato Pancreato Biliary (HPB) unit. Volume outcome analyses show significantly better results for patients undergoing PD at high-volume centres (Begg et al. JAMA 280:1747–1751, 1998; Finlayson et al. Arch Surg 138:721–725, 2003; Birkmeyer et al. N Engl J Med 346:1128–1137, 2002; Gouma et al. Ann Surg 232:786–795, 2000). Centralisation of PD seems to be the logical conclusion to be drawn from these results. In countries like Australia with a small and widely dispersed population, centralisation may not be always feasible. Alternative strategy would be to have similar systems in place to those in high-volume centres to achieve similar results at low-volume centres. Many Australian tertiary care centres perform low to medium volumes of PD (Chen et al. HPB 12:101–108, 2010; Kwok et al. ANZ J Surg 80:605–608, 2010; Barnett and Collier ANZ J Surg 76:563–568, 2006; Samra et al. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 10:415–421, 2011). Most of these have a specialised HPB unit, accredited by the Australia and New Zealand Hepatic pancreatic and biliary association (ANZHPBA), as training units for post fellowship training in HPB surgery. It is imperative to perform outcome-based analyses in these units to ensure safety and high quality of care. Methods Retrospective analysis of database for periampullary carcinoma (1998 till date) was performed in an ANZHPBA accredited HPB unit based at a tertiary care teaching hospital in South Australia. Because age older than 74 years is shown to be a predictive marker of increased morbidity and mortality after a PD, we analysed the outcomes in this subset of patients separately. Results Fifty-three patients underwent PD in 14 years. Overall mortality was 3.8 %. The last in hospital mortality was in 1999. The morbidity rates and the oncologic outcomes were similar to those in high-volume units. Conclusions PD can be safely performed in a low-volume specialised unit at centres where the amenities and processes at high-volume centres can be replicated.
Keywords: Animals
Humans
Pancreatic Neoplasms
Postoperative Complications
Treatment Outcome
Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Hospital Mortality
Risk Assessment
Retrospective Studies
Cohort Studies
Follow-Up Studies
Age Factors
Sex Factors
Time Factors
Aged
Middle Aged
Surgery Department, Hospital
Workload
Australia
Female
Male
Rights: © Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-2431-9
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2431-9
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 2
Surgery publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.