Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/85871
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Oude Rengerink, K. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zwolsman, S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ubbink, D. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Mol, B. | - |
dc.contributor.author | van Dijk, N. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Vermeulen, H. | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, 2013; 18(4):129-138 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1356-5524 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1473-6810 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/85871 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To identify and compare tools to assess Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) behaviour among healthcare professionals. Design: Systematic review. Data sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PsychInfo and CINAHL up to July 2011. Study selection: Titles, abstracts and eligible full text articles were screened by two reviewers independently. Data extraction: Relevant data were extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second reviewer. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: original studies among all healthcare professionals that described the development or use of EBP behaviour assessment tools. Results: Of 19 310 identified articles, 172 studies were included. We identified 117 questionnaires, 10 interviews or focus groups, nine observational studies, 27 chart evaluations and nine studies used a combination of methods. Psychometric properties of the questionnaires used were reported in about half of the studies, in seven studies that assess a single EBM step and in six studies that assess a combination of EBM steps. One of these assessed all five steps of EBP. Conclusions: Valid and reliable EBP behaviour assessment tools are available. However, only one questionnaire validly assessed all five EBP steps, covering the entire concept of EBP. | - |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Katrien Oude Rengerink, Sandra E Zwolsman, Dirk T Ubbink, Ben W J Mol, Nynke van Dijk, Hester Vermeulen | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | BMJ Publishing Group | - |
dc.rights | Copyright status unknown | - |
dc.source.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/eb-2012-100969 | - |
dc.subject | Humans | - |
dc.subject | Psychometrics | - |
dc.subject | Evidence-Based Medicine | - |
dc.subject | Health Personnel | - |
dc.subject | Surveys and Questionnaires | - |
dc.title | Tools to assess Evidence-Based Practice behaviour among healthcare professionals | - |
dc.type | Journal article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1136/eb-2012-100969 | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | Mol, B. [0000-0001-8337-550X] | - |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 7 Obstetrics and Gynaecology publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.