Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/87659
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZutshi, A.-
dc.contributor.authorEckert, K.-
dc.contributor.authorHawthorne, G.-
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, A.-
dc.contributor.authorGoldney, R.-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationBipolar Disorders: an international journal of psychiatry and neurosciences, 2011; 13(2):182-188-
dc.identifier.issn1399-5618-
dc.identifier.issn1399-5618-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/87659-
dc.description.abstractObjective:  To identify any changes in the prevalence of bipolar disorder (BD) between 1998, 2004, and 2008. Method:  Cross-sectional population-based surveys were conducted involving random and representative samples of South Australian adults aged ≥ 15 years. BD was assessed using the mood module of the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders instrument (PRIME-MD), a single question related to doctor-diagnosed BD and the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ), which defines bipolar spectrum disorder. Results:  The PRIME-MD-derived prevalence of BD increased significantly from 0.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.27–0.79] in 1998 to 1.0% (95% CI: 0.61–1.31) in 2004 and 1.5% (95% CI: 1.05–1.91) in 2008, demonstrating a significant increased linear trend (χ2 = 13.91, df = 2, p = 0.002). Similarly, reported doctor-diagnosed BD increased significantly from 1.1% (95% CI: 0.75–1.51) in 1998 to 1.7% (95% CI: 1.26–2.18) in 2004 and 2.9% (95% CI: 2.28–3.48) in 2008 (Linear trend test χ2 = 24.55, df = 2, p < 0.001). The MDQ-derived diagnosis of bipolar spectrum disorder changed from 2.5% (95% CI: 1.96–3.08) in 2004 to 3.3% (95% CI: 2.66–3.94) in 2008 (χ2 = 3.22, df = 1, p < 0.10), but this difference did not attain statistical significance. Confining the analysis to those positive for BD on all three methods, there was a significant increase in the prevalence of the detection of BD using all three measures (χ2 = 4.43, df = 1, p = 0.03) between 2004 and 2008. Conclusions:  There has been an increased prevalence of BD in South Australia over the last decade, but this may be related to changing diagnostic practices rather than a true increase.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityAmit Zutshi, Kerena A Eckert, Graeme Hawthorne, Anne W Taylor, and Robert D Goldney-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons-
dc.rights© 2011 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-5618.2011.00907.x-
dc.subjectBipolar disorders; cross-sectional population-based survey; MDQ; PRIME-MD-
dc.titleChanges in the prevalence of bipolar disorders between 1998 and 2008 in an Australian population-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1399-5618.2011.00907.x-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidTaylor, A. [0000-0002-4422-7974]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 7
Psychiatry publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.