Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/87924
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorManning, N.-
dc.contributor.editorHannes, K.-
dc.contributor.editorLockwood, C.-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationSynthesizing qualitative research: choosing the right approach, 2012 / Hannes, K., Lockwood, C. (ed./s), pp.161-171-
dc.identifier.isbn9780470656389-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/87924-
dc.description.abstractThis chapter begins by arguing that the purpose or desired end product of a review should be the key consideration when choosing between methods for qualitative evidence synthesis (QES). The second half of the chapter engages with the notion that the field of QES is characterized by differences in approach. These differences are located within the epistemological and ontological differences which make up qualitative research and the range of disciplines contributing to QES methods. A discussion of approaches to searching and the use of quality assessment reveal substantial overlap between the methods described in this book.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityNathan Manning-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherWiley-
dc.rights© 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Published 2012 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119959847.ch8-
dc.titleConclusion-
dc.typeBook chapter-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/9781119959847.ch8-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidManning, N. [0000-0003-0488-0888]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 7
Translational Health Science publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.