Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/91006
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Type: | Journal article |
Title: | Enlightenment grows from fundamentals |
Author: | Navarro, D. Perfors, A. |
Citation: | Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2011; 34(4):207-208 |
Publisher: | Cambridge University Press |
Issue Date: | 2011 |
ISSN: | 0140-525X 1469-1825 |
Statement of Responsibility: | Matt Jones, Bradley C. Love |
Abstract: | Jones & Love (J&L) contend that the Bayesian approach should integrate process constraints with abstract computational analysis. We agree, but argue that the fundamentalist/enlightened dichotomy is a false one: Enlightened research is deeply intertwined with – and to a large extent is impossible without – the basic, fundamental work upon which it is based. |
Keywords: | Bayesian modeling; cognitive processing; levels of analysis; rational analysis; representation |
Rights: | © Cambridge University Press 2011 |
DOI: | 10.1017/S0140525X11000367 |
Published version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x11000367 |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 2 Psychology publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
hdl_91006.pdf | Accepted version | 223.85 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.