Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/91006
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Enlightenment grows from fundamentals
Author: Navarro, D.
Perfors, A.
Citation: Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2011; 34(4):207-208
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Issue Date: 2011
ISSN: 0140-525X
1469-1825
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Matt Jones, Bradley C. Love
Abstract: Jones & Love (J&L) contend that the Bayesian approach should integrate process constraints with abstract computational analysis. We agree, but argue that the fundamentalist/enlightened dichotomy is a false one: Enlightened research is deeply intertwined with – and to a large extent is impossible without – the basic, fundamental work upon which it is based.
Keywords: Bayesian modeling; cognitive processing; levels of analysis; rational analysis; representation
Rights: © Cambridge University Press 2011
DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X11000367
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x11000367
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 2
Psychology publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_91006.pdfAccepted version223.85 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.