Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/91403
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Type: | Conference item |
Title: | Predicting fear of cancer recurrence in gynaecological cancer survivors |
Author: | Hughes, J. Whitford, H. Collins, K. Denson, L. |
Citation: | Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2014, vol.10, iss.Suppl. 9, pp.196-196 |
Publisher: | Wiley |
Issue Date: | 2014 |
ISSN: | 1743-7555 1743-7563 |
Conference Name: | 2014 World Cancer Congress Abstracts (3 Dec 2014 - 6 Dec 2014 : Melbourne, Vic.) |
Statement of Responsibility: | Jane Hughes, Hayley Whitford, Kathryn Collins, Linley Denson |
Abstract: | Background: Despite high 5-year survival for some gynaecological cancers (</- 82%), little research addresses survivorship concerns in this group. Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) has been ranked the largest concern/unmet need for gynaecological cancer survivors, evidencing associations with poor quality-of-life and increased psychological morbidity. Aim: To investigate predictors of FCR in early-to-mid stage gynaecological cancer survivors including the under-researched impact of psychological flexibility, coping styles, and single-item interpretations of illness. Methods: Using a cross-sectional postal-questionnaire, 145 women completed demographics and standardised measures of FCR (FCRI), cancer coping styles (MAC), interpretation of illness (IIQ), psychological flexibility (AAQ-II), and mood (DASS21). Results: A majority of participants (M = 61 years) were married (53.3%) with children, had a tertiary education (31.1%), and were not currently working (60.0%). Diagnoses were mixed, time since diagnosis ranged from 1-32 years (M = 5 years) with 15.9% acute survivors (<1 year postdiagnosis). A linear regression, including eight predictors with moderate-tolarge univariate associations (r >/-.40), evidenced a significant model (p = .000) accounting for 63% of the variance on FCR (adjusted R2). Significant individual predictors included greater anxiously preoccupied coping style (beta = .51), 'threat/enemy' interpretations of cancer (beta = .17), poorer quality-of-life (beta = -.18), and greater fatalistic coping (beta = .14). Other predictors (depression, helpless/hopeless coping, 'punishment' interpretations, and psychological flexibility) were not significant. Conclusions: Compared to FCRI norms, participants appeared less concerned about cancer recurrence despite most being extended/permanent survivors (1+ years post-diagnosis), perhaps reflecting accurate expectations of good survival among gynaecological cancer survivors compared with other cancer types. Respondents' anxiously preoccupied coping style best predicted FCR, potentially highlighting a focus for intervention. Although single-item 'threat/enemy' interpretations of cancer appeared predictive of FCR and could act as a quick screening item, prediction was small-tomoderate in size, thus research into the previously proposed screening ability of the 9-item FCRI Severity subscale is warranted to determine the better tool. |
Description: | Program of UICC World Cancer Congress |
Rights: | © 2014 The Authors. Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology © 2014 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd |
DOI: | 10.1111/ajco.12332 |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 2 Psychology publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.