Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/93234
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Conference paper
Title: Agronomic and sustainability outcomes from compost application in South Australian citrus orchards
Author: Crisp, P.
Baker, G.
Wheeler, S.
Citation: Acta Horticulturae, 2014 / Biala, J., Prange, R., Raviv, M. (ed./s), vol.1018, iss.1018, pp.457-464
Publisher: International Society for Horticultural Science
Issue Date: 2014
Series/Report no.: Acta Horticulturae
ISBN: 9462610045
9789462610040
ISSN: 0567-7572
2406-6168
Conference Name: 1st International Symposium on Organic Matter Management and Compost Use in Horticulture (4 Apr 2011 - 7 Apr 2011 : Adelaide, South Australia)
Editor: Biala, J.
Prange, R.
Raviv, M.
Statement of
Responsibility: 
P. Crisp, G. Baker and S. Wheeler
Abstract: SARDI has undertaken trials with compost mulch, grape marc and animal manure at sites on three citrus orchards in South Australia for a number of years. The trials were established to evaluate the potential of soil amendments as part of an integrated management program for Kelly’s citrus thrips (KCT). Experimental sites were designed to obtain best possible data for pest management within budget limitations, subsequently, the agronomic and environmental data were in some cases restricted to one site and selected representative treatments. A range of data were collected, including fruit yields, and fruit, soil, leaf, and water quality measures and biological changes, and the potential for water savings assessed. The field trials involved application of various rates of compost to crops, ranging from 40-200 m3 ha-1 for compost mulch, 100-200 m3 ha-1 for grape marc, and 10-40 m3 ha-1 for animal manure. The recycled green waste and composted animal manure have provided significant pest management and agronomic benefits through suppression of KCT and improved yield and fruit size. There were considerable economic net benefits from every type of trial application to citrus at both sites over the four year period assessed. For example, for every dollar invested in an application of 40 m3 ha-1 compost mulch at Loxton North, a return of about $ 5 dollars was realised. Returns ranged from $ 1.91 to 4.96. There also is the benefit of improved water efficiency that could provide significant cost savings. The longevity of these benefits remains unknown and is currently being evaluated. Whilst the grape marc treatments improved yields, and are cheaper than the composted green waste, the level of suppression of KCT was not as good as that provided by the compost, and the increased acidity that resulted from the high phosphate levels associated with the grape marc treatments could result in reduced quality. It seems that higher levels of application for compost mulch create more overall benefits in terms of fruit quality and tree health.
Keywords: compost
soil amendment
biological control
Description: Also cited as: Acta Horticulturae, 2014; 1018:457-464
Rights: Copyright 2011 International Society for Horticultural Science
DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2014.1018.50
Published version: http://www.actahort.org/books/1018/1018_50.htm
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 2
Global Food Studies publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.