Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/97012
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKoehn, J.D.-
dc.contributor.authorKing, A.J.-
dc.contributor.authorBeesley, L.-
dc.contributor.authorCopeland, C.-
dc.contributor.authorZampatti, B.P.-
dc.contributor.authorMallen-Cooper, M.-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationEcological Management and Restoration, 2014; 15(Suppl. 1):40-50-
dc.identifier.issn1442-7001-
dc.identifier.issn1442-8903-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/97012-
dc.descriptionArticle first published online: 22 APR 2014-
dc.description.abstractIncreased regulation and extraction of water from rivers has contributed to the decline of fishes, and the use of environmental water allocations (EWAs) is now a key rehabilitation measure. Major reform of water policy in the Murray-Darling Basin (MDB), Australia, has recently provided significant EWAs to improve ecological outcomes. Conflict over water buybacks, the value of the water and the need to maximise environmental benefits and minimise risks of unwanted outcomes has increased the expectation for science to underpin and justify such actions. Recent research has focussed attention on the need to understand fish–flow relationships. The Native Fish Strategy for the Murray-Darling Basin 2003–2013 (NFS), while not specifically targeted at water policy reform or water delivery, has provided fish ecology research and flow restoration experimentation and contributed considerable new scientific knowledge to support flow management. It has contributed to a substantial and positive change in environmental watering for fish, with native fish targets now regularly incorporated into watering objectives. This study documents changes to water management in the MDB, summarises current knowledge of flow-related fish ecology in the MDB, highlights the benefits and risks of some water management practises and provides recommendations for future management and research. A major recommendation is the need for a coordinated, cross-jurisdictional approach to flow restoration for native fish, ensuring that the best available science is being used in all watering allocations. We caution on the use of environmental works such as regulators to artificially inundate floodplains and suggest that such approaches should be viewed as large-scale experiments with the significant risks posed to fish needing to be recognised, adequately monitored and adaptively managed.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityJohn D. Koehn, Alison J. King, Leah Beesley, Craig Copeland, Brenton P. Zampatti and Martin Mallen-Cooper-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherWiley-
dc.rights© 2014 The Authors. Ecological Management & Restoration published by Ecological Society of Australia and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emr.12091-
dc.subjectrivers; floodplains; environmental water; rehabilitation; restoration; water management-
dc.titleFlows for native fish in the Murray-Darling Basin: lessons and considerations for future management-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/emr.12091-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 3
Earth and Environmental Sciences publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_97012.pdfPublished version363.03 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.