Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/103275
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Definition and validation of "favorable high-risk prostate cancer": implications for personalizing treatment of radiation-managed patients
Author: Muralidhar, V.
Chen, M.
Reznor, G.
Moran, B.
Braccioforte, M.
Beard, C.
Feng, F.
Hoffman, K.
Choueiri, T.
Martin, N.
Sweeney, C.
Trinh, Q.
Nguyen, P.
Citation: International Journal of Radiation: Oncology - Biology - Physics, 2015; 93(4):828-835
Publisher: Elsevier
Issue Date: 2015
ISSN: 0360-3016
1879-355X
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Vinayak Muralidhar, Ming-Hui Chen, Gally Reznor, Brian J. Moran, Michelle H. Braccioforte, Clair J. Beard, Felix Y. Feng, Karen E. Hoffman, Toni K. Choueiri, Neil E. Martin, Christopher J. Sweeney, Quoc-Dien Trinh and Paul L. Nguyen
Abstract: Purpose: To define and validate a classification of favorable high-risk prostate cancer that could be used to personalize therapy, given that consensus guidelines recommend similar treatments for all radiation-managed patients with high-risk disease. Methods and Materials: We studied 3618 patients with cT1-T3aN0M0 high-risk or unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate adenocarcinoma treated with radiation at a single institution between 1997 and 2013. Favorable high-risk was defined as T1c disease with either Gleason 4 + 4 = 8 and prostate-specific antigen <10 ng/mL or Gleason 6 and prostate-specific antigen >20 ng/mL. Competing risks regression was used to determine differences in the risk of prostate cancer–specific mortality (PCSM) after controlling for baseline factors and treatment. Our results were validated in a cohort of 13,275 patients using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database. Results: Patients with favorable high-risk disease had significantly better PCSM than other men with high-risk disease (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18-0.996, P=.049) and similar PCSM as men with unfavorable intermediate-risk disease (AHR 1.17, 95% CI 0.50-2.75, P=.710). We observed very similar results within the SEER-Medicare cohort (favorable high-risk vs other high-risk: AHR 0.21, 95% CI 0.11-0.41, P<.001; favorable high-risk vs unfavorable intermediate-risk: AHR 0.67, 95% CI 0.33-1.36, P=.268). Conclusions: Patients with favorable high-risk prostate cancer have significantly better PCSM than other patients with high-risk disease and similar PCSM as those with unfavorable intermediate-risk disease, who are typically treated with shorter-course androgen deprivation therapy. This new classification system may allow for personalization of treatment within high-risk disease, such as consideration of shorter-course androgen deprivation therapy for favorable high-risk disease.
Keywords: Humans
Prostatic Neoplasms
Androgen Antagonists
Prostate-Specific Antigen
Prognosis
Brachytherapy
SEER Program
Confidence Intervals
Proportional Hazards Models
Risk Assessment
Aged
Middle Aged
Male
Neoplasm Grading
Precision Medicine
Rights: © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.07.2281
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.07.2281
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.07.2281
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 7
Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_103275.pdfPublished version466.23 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.