Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/108310
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Eagle, A. | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Philosophical Studies: an international journal for philosophy in the analytic tradition, 2016; 173(8):2215-2231 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0031-8116 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1573-0883 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2440/108310 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The notion of multiple location plays an important role in the characterization of endurantism. Several authors have recently offered cases intended to demonstrate the incoherence of multiple location. I argue that these cases do not succeed in making multiple location problematic. Along the way, several crucial issues about multiple location and its use by endurantists are clarified. | - |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility | Antony Eagle | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Springer | - |
dc.rights | © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015 | - |
dc.source.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0605-z | - |
dc.subject | Persistence; endurance; multiple location; extension; time-travel; mereology; recombination principle; fundamental relations | - |
dc.title | Multiple location defended | - |
dc.type | Journal article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s11098-015-0605-z | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
dc.identifier.orcid | Eagle, A. [0000-0002-0868-377X] | - |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 8 Philosophy publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
RA_hdl_108310.pdf Restricted Access | Restricted Access | 327.39 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.