Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/108310
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEagle, A.-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationPhilosophical Studies: an international journal for philosophy in the analytic tradition, 2016; 173(8):2215-2231-
dc.identifier.issn0031-8116-
dc.identifier.issn1573-0883-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/108310-
dc.description.abstractThe notion of multiple location plays an important role in the characterization of endurantism. Several authors have recently offered cases intended to demonstrate the incoherence of multiple location. I argue that these cases do not succeed in making multiple location problematic. Along the way, several crucial issues about multiple location and its use by endurantists are clarified.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityAntony Eagle-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.rights© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0605-z-
dc.subjectPersistence; endurance; multiple location; extension; time-travel; mereology; recombination principle; fundamental relations-
dc.titleMultiple location defended-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11098-015-0605-z-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidEagle, A. [0000-0002-0868-377X]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 8
Philosophy publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
RA_hdl_108310.pdf
  Restricted Access
Restricted Access327.39 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.