Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/108310
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Type: | Journal article |
Title: | Multiple location defended |
Author: | Eagle, A. |
Citation: | Philosophical Studies: an international journal for philosophy in the analytic tradition, 2016; 173(8):2215-2231 |
Publisher: | Springer |
Issue Date: | 2016 |
ISSN: | 0031-8116 1573-0883 |
Statement of Responsibility: | Antony Eagle |
Abstract: | The notion of multiple location plays an important role in the characterization of endurantism. Several authors have recently offered cases intended to demonstrate the incoherence of multiple location. I argue that these cases do not succeed in making multiple location problematic. Along the way, several crucial issues about multiple location and its use by endurantists are clarified. |
Keywords: | Persistence; endurance; multiple location; extension; time-travel; mereology; recombination principle; fundamental relations |
Rights: | © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11098-015-0605-z |
Published version: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0605-z |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 8 Philosophy publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
RA_hdl_108310.pdf Restricted Access | Restricted Access | 327.39 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.