Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/111671
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBond, A.-
dc.contributor.authorO'Connor, P.-
dc.contributor.authorCavagnaro, T.-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationLand Use Policy: the international journal covering all aspects of land use, 2018; 72:410-419-
dc.identifier.issn0264-8377-
dc.identifier.issn1873-5754-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/111671-
dc.description.abstractVoluntary incentive programs are widely used to generate conservation actions on private land. Although there is a growing body of research about factors that influence landholder participation in incentive programs, studies generally conceptualise landholders in agricultural landscapes as owner-occupier, farming individuals or families. Few studies have considered participation by absentee landholders and fewer still have recognised group landholders (e.g. non-government organisations or community groups) as potential incentive program participants. We examined participation in a conservation stewardship tender (reverse auction) in South Australia to identify the diversity within participants, and particularly to evaluate the extent of participation by absentee landholders and groups. A diverse set of landholders participated, where nearly a quarter of participants were absentee landholders, and a small component were groups. Although small in number, groups were shown to be important because they were likely to offer larger land areas in the stewardship tender. With very little known about how absentee and group landholders may differ from their counterparts, further research is recommended to inform incentive program design. We recommend that incentive programs consider landholder diversity in order to achieve effective conservation in agricultural landscapes.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityAnthelia J. Bond, Patrick J. O’Connor, Timothy R. Cavagnaro-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.rights© 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.067-
dc.subjectStewardship; covenant; auction; native vegetation; Bayesian model averaging-
dc.titleWho participates in conservation incentive programs? Absentee and group landholders are in the mix-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.067-
dc.relation.granthttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/FT120100463-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidBond, A. [0000-0002-4391-3577]-
dc.identifier.orcidO'Connor, P. [0000-0002-8966-9370]-
dc.identifier.orcidCavagnaro, T. [0000-0002-9922-5677]-
Appears in Collections:Agriculture, Food and Wine publications
Aurora harvest 8

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_111671.pdfAccepted version4.93 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.