1. Adelaide Research & Scholarship
  2. Schools and Disciplines
  3. School of Medicine
  4. Medicine
  5. Medicine publications
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/114718
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKok, T.-
dc.contributor.authorBurrell, C.-
dc.date.issued1989-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1989; 27(2):364-366-
dc.identifier.issn0095-1137-
dc.identifier.issn1098-660X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/114718-
dc.description.abstractFive different enzyme immunoassays, electron microscopy, and latex agglutination (Slidex; bioMerieux) were compared for the rapid detection of human rotavirus in fecal specimens. The enzyme immunoassay using rotavirus polyclonal antiserum (Dakopatts) with simple in-house modifications was shown by the use of confirmatory tests to be the most sensitive and specific procedure.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityT.-W. Kok and C. J. Burrell-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherAmerican Society for Microbiology-
dc.rightsCopyright © 1989, American Society for Microbiology-
dc.source.urihttps://jcm.asm.org/content/27/2/364-
dc.subjectFeces-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectRotavirus-
dc.subjectMicroscopy, Electron-
dc.subjectImmunoenzyme Techniques-
dc.subjectLatex Fixation Tests-
dc.titleComparison of five enzyme immunoassays, electron microscopy, and latex agglutination for detection of rotavirus in fecal specimens-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1128/jcm.27.2.364-366.1989-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidBurrell, C. [0000-0002-4020-349X]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 8
Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.