Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/130971
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Ventricular arrhythmia burden during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic
Author: O’Shea, C.J.
Thomas, G.
Middeldorp, M.E.
Harper, C.
Elliott, A.D.
Ray, N.
Lau, D.H.
Campbell, K.
Sanders, P.
Citation: European Heart Journal, 2021; 42(5):520-528
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Issue Date: 2021
ISSN: 0195-668X
1522-9645
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Catherine J O’Shea, Gijo Thomas, Melissa E Middeldorp, Curtis Harper, Adrian D Elliott, Noemi Ray ... et al.
Abstract: Aims: Our objective was to determine the ventricular arrhythmia burden in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) patients during COVID-19. Methods and results: In this multicentre, observational, cohort study over a 100-day period during the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA, we assessed ventricular arrhythmias in ICD patients from 20 centres in 13 states, via remote monitoring. Comparison was via a 100-day control period (late 2019) and seasonal control period (early 2019). The primary outcome was the impact of COVID-19 on ventricular arrhythmia burden. The secondary outcome was correlation with COVID-19 incidence. During the COVID-19 period, 5963 ICD patients underwent remote monitoring, with 16 942 episodes of treated ventricular arrhythmias (2.8 events per 100 patient-days). Ventricular arrhythmia burden progressively declined during COVID-19 (P < 0.001). The proportion of patients with ventricular arrhythmias amongst the high COVID-19 incidence states was significantly reduced compared with those in low incidence states [odds ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54–0.69, P < 0.001]. Comparing patients remotely monitored during both COVID-19 and control periods (n = 2458), significantly fewer ventricular arrhythmias occurred during COVID-19 [incident rate ratio (IRR) 0.68, 95% CI 0.58–0.79, P < 0.001]. This difference persisted when comparing the 1719 patients monitored during both the COVID-19 and seasonal control periods (IRR 0.69, 95% CI 0.56–0.85, P < 0.001). Conclusions: During COVID-19, there was a 32% reduction in ventricular arrhythmias needing device therapies, coinciding with measures of social isolation. There was a 39% reduction in the proportion of patients with ventricular arrhythmias in states with higher COVID-19 incidence. These findings highlight the potential role of real-life stressors in ventricular arrhythmia burden in individuals with ICDs.
Keywords: COVID-19; implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; ventricular arrhythmia; ventricular tachycardia, Ventricular fibrillation; remote monitoring
Rights: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa893
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa893
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 8
Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.