Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/136372
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Quality and safety indicators for home care recipients in Australia: development and cross-sectional analyses
Author: Caughey, G.E.
Lang, C.E.
Bray, S.C.E.
Sluggett, J.K.
Whitehead, C.
Visvanathan, R.
Evans, K.
Corlis, M.
Cornell, V.
Barker, A.L.
Wesselingh, S.
Inacio, M.C.
Citation: BMJ Open, 2022; 12(8):e063152-1-e063152- 11
Publisher: BMJ Journals
Issue Date: 2022
ISSN: 2044-6055
2044-6055
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Gillian Elizabeth Caughey, Catherine E Lang, Sarah Catherine Elizabeth Bray, Janet K Sluggett, Craig Whitehead, Renuka Visvanathan, Keith Evans, Megan Corlis, Victoria Cornell, Anna L Barker, Steve Wesselingh, Maria C Inacio
Abstract: Objectives: To develop and examine the prevalence of quality and safety indicators to monitor care of older Australians receiving home care packages (HCPs), a government-funded aged care programme to support individuals to live at home independently. Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: Home care recipients, Australia. Participants: 90 650 older individuals (aged ≥65 years old and ≥50 years old for people of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander descent) who received a HCP between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2016 nationally were included. Primary and secondary outcome measures: The Registry of Senior Australians developed 15 quality and safety indicators: antipsychotic use, high sedative load, chronic opioid use, antimicrobial use, premature mortality, home medicines reviews, chronic disease management plan, wait-time for HCP, falls, fractures, medication-related adverse events, weight loss/malnutrition, delirium/ dementia-related hospitalisations, emergency department (ED) presentations and pressure injuries. Risk adjusted prevalence (%, 95% CI) and geographical area (statistical level 3) variation during 2016 were examined. Results: In 2016, a total of 102 590 HCP episodes were included for 90 650 individuals, with 66.9% (n=68 598) level 1–2 HCP episodes (ie, for basic care needs) and 33.1% (n=33 992) level 3–4 HCP (ie, higher care needs). The most prevalent indicators included: antibiotic use (52.4%, 95% CI 52.0 to 52.7), chronic disease management plans (38.1%, 95% CI 37.8 to 38.4), high sedative load (29.1%, 95% CI 28.8 to 29.4) and ED presentations (26.4%, 95% CI 25.9 to 26.9). HCP median wait time was 134 days (IQR 41–406). Geographical variation was highest in chronic disease management plans and ED presentations (20.7% of areas outside expected range). Conclusion: A comprehensive outcome monitoring system to monitor the quality and safety of care and variation for HCP recipients was developed. It provides a pragmatic, efficient and low burden tool to support evidence-based quality and safety improvement initiatives for the aged care sector.
Rights: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063152
Grant ID: http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/APP1156439
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063152
Appears in Collections:Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_136372.pdfPublished version612 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.