Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/139350
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: A Personalized Risk Model for Azacitidine Outcome in Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Other Myeloid Neoplasms Identified by Machine Learning Model Utilizing Real-World Data
Author: Sharplin, K.
Proudman, W.
Chhetri, R.
Tran, E.N.H.
Choong, J.
Kutyna, M.
Selby, P.
Sapio, A.
Friel, O.
Khanna, S.
Singhal, D.
Damin, M.
Ross, D.
Yeung, D.
Thomas, D.
Kok, C.H.
Hiwase, D.
Citation: Cancers, 2023; 15(16):1-14
Publisher: MDPI AG
Issue Date: 2023
ISSN: 2072-6694
2072-6694
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Kirsty Sharplin, William Proudman, Rakchha Chhetri, Elizabeth Ngoc Hoa Tran, Jamie Choong, Monika Kutyna, Philip Selby, Aidan Sapio, Oisin Friel, Shreyas Khanna, Deepak Singhal, Michelle Damin, David Ross, David Yeung, Daniel Thomas, Chung H. Kok, and Devendra Hiwase
Abstract: Azacitidine is an approved therapy for higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). However, only 30–40% patients respond to azacitidine, and the responses may take up to six cycles to become evident. Delayed responses and the myelosuppressive effects of azacitidine make it challenging to predict which patients will benefit. This is further compounded by a lack of uniform prognostic tools to identify patients at risk of early treatment failure. Hence, we performed a retrospective analysis of 273 consecutive azacytidine-treated patients. The median overall survival was 16.25 months with only 9% alive at 5 years. By using pre-treatment variables incorporated into a random forest machine learning model, we successfully identified those patients unlikely to benefit from azacytidine upfront (7.99 vs. 22.8 months, p < 0.0001). This model also identified those who required significantly more hospitalizations and transfusion support. Notably, it accurately predicted survival outcomes, outperforming the existing prognostic scoring system. By integrating somatic mutations, we further refined the model and identified three distinct risk groups with significant differences in survival (5.6 vs. 10.5 vs. 43.5 months, p < 0.0001). These real-world findings emphasize the urgent need for personalized prediction tools tailored to hypomethylating agents, reducing unnecessary complications and resource utilization in MDS treatment.
Keywords: azacitidine; prognostication; MDS; survival; machine learning
Rights: © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/).
DOI: 10.3390/cancers15164019
Grant ID: http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1195517
http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1182564
http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1184485
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15164019
Appears in Collections:Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_139350.pdfPublished version2.99 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.