Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/139552
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: A comprehensive review and performance evaluation of bioinformatics tools for HLA class I peptide-binding prediction
Author: Mei, S.
Li, F.
Leier, A.
Marquez-Lago, T.T.
Giam, K.
Croft, N.P.
Akutsu, T.
Ian Smith, A.
Li, J.
Rossjohn, J.
Purcell, A.W.
Song, J.
Citation: Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2019; 21(4):1119-1135
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Issue Date: 2019
ISSN: 1467-5463
1477-4054
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Shutao Mei, Fuyi Li, André Leier, Tatiana T. Marquez-Lago, Kailin Giam, Nathan P. Croft, Tatsuya Akutsu, A. Ian Smith, Jian Li, Jamie Rossjohn, Anthony W. Purcell and Jiangning Song
Abstract: Human leukocyte antigen class I (HLA-I) molecules are encoded by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I loci in humans. The binding and interaction between HLA-I molecules and intracellular peptides derived from a variety of proteolytic mechanisms play a crucial role in subsequent T-cell recognition of target cells and the specificity of the immune response. In this context, tools that predict the likelihood for a peptide to bind to specific HLA class I allotypes are important for selecting the most promising antigenic targets for immunotherapy. In this article, we comprehensively review a variety of currently available tools for predicting the binding of peptides to a selection of HLA-I allomorphs. Specifically, we compare their calculation methods for the prediction score, employed algorithms, evaluation strategies and software functionalities. In addition, we have evaluated the prediction performance of the reviewed tools based on an independent validation data set, containing 21 101 experimentally verified ligands across 19 HLA-I allotypes. The benchmarking results show that MixMHCpred 2.0.1 achieves the best performance for predicting peptides binding to most of the HLA-I allomorphs studied, while NetMHCpan 4.0 and NetMHCcons 1.1 outperform the other machine learning-based and consensus-based tools, respectively. Importantly, it should be noted that a peptide predicted with a higher binding score for a specific HLA allotype does not necessarily imply it will be immunogenic. That said, peptide-binding predictors are still very useful in that they can help to significantly reduce the large number of epitope candidates that need to be experimentally verified. Several other factors, including susceptibility to proteasome cleavage, peptide transport into the endoplasmic reticulum and T-cell receptor repertoire, also contribute to the immunogenicity of peptide antigens, and some of them can be considered by some predictors. Therefore, integrating features derived from these additional factors together with HLA-binding properties by using machine-learning algorithms may increase the prediction accuracy of immunogenic peptides. As such, we anticipate that this review and benchmarking survey will assist researchers in selecting appropriate prediction tools that best suit their purposes and provide useful guidelines for the development of improved antigen predictors in the future.
Keywords: HLA; peptide binding; bioinformatics; machine learning; sequence analysis; web server; prediction model; performance benchmarking
Rights: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbz051
Grant ID: http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP120104460
http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP150104503
Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbz051
Appears in Collections:Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.