Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/44161
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: The difference between hazard and risk in the relation between bone density and fracture
Author: Nordin, B.
Baghurst, P.
Metcalfe, A.
Citation: Calcified Tissue International, 2007; 80(6):349-352
Publisher: Springer
Issue Date: 2007
ISSN: 0171-967X
1432-0827
Statement of
Responsibility: 
B. E. Christopher Nordin, Peter A. Baghurst and Andrew Metcalfe
Abstract: The relation between fracture risk and bone density is frequently defined in terms of a relative hazard derived from the Cox proportional hazards model. The relative hazard is a multiplicative factor representing the rise in hazard for each standard deviation fall in bone mineral density, which has a typical value of about 1.5. It is not generally appreciated that this hazard may only be equated with absolute risk when risk is very low; at higher risk and over long periods, it is inappropriate to apply a multiplicative factor to absolute risk because risk has a range of 0-1 and cannot exceed unity. Here, we show how “hazard” can be converted to risk and how misleading the current practice of equating relative hazards with relative risks can be.
Keywords: Fracture risk
Relative hazard
Bone density
Description: The original publication can be found at www.springerlink.com
DOI: 10.1007/s00223-007-9022-4
Published version: http://www.springerlink.com/content/u033206361025817/
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
Environment Institute publications
Mathematical Sciences publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.