Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/62949
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Type: Journal article
Title: Patient satisfaction with point-of-care testing in general practice
Author: Laurence, C.
Gialamas, A.
Bubner, T.
Yelland, L.
Willson, K.
Ryan, P.
Beilby, J.
Gill, J.
Glastonbury, B.
Killeen, R.
McKittrick, P.
Shephard, M.
St John, A.
Thomas, D.
Tideman, P.
Tirimacco, R.
Worley, P.
Citation: British Journal of General Practice, 2010; 60(572):166-171
Publisher: Royal Coll General Practitioners
Issue Date: 2010
ISSN: 0960-1643
1478-5242
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Caroline O Laurence, Angela Gialamas, Tanya Bubner, Lisa Yelland, Kristyn Willson, Phil Ryan, Justin Beilby, and the Point of Care Testing in General Practice Trial Management Group
Abstract: <h4>Background</h4>Point-of-care testing is increasingly being used in general practice to assist GPs in their management of patients with chronic disease. However, patient satisfaction and acceptability of point-of-care testing in general practice has not been widely studied.<h4>Aim</h4>To determine if patients are more satisfied with point-of-care testing than with pathology laboratory testing for three chronic conditions.<h4>Design of study</h4>As part of a large multicentre, randomised, controlled trial assessing the use of point-of-care testing in Australian general practice, satisfaction was measured for patients having pathology testing performed by point-of-care testing devices or pathology laboratories. Patients in the trial were managed by GPs for diabetes, hyperlipidaemia, and/or anticoagulant therapy.<h4>Method</h4>Patient satisfaction was measured using level of agreement with a variety of statements at the end of the study with a patient satisfaction questionnaire for both the intervention and control groups. Analysis was performed using a mixed model analysis of variance (ANOVA) with allowance for clustering at the practice level following Box-Cox transformations of the data to achieve normality.<h4>Results</h4>Overall, intervention patients reported that they were satisfied with point-of-care testing. In comparison with the control group, the intervention group had a higher level of agreement than control patients with statements relating to their satisfaction with the collection process (P<0.001) and confidence in the process (P<0.001). They also viewed point-of-care testing as strengthening their relationship with their GP (P = 0.010) and motivational in terms of better managing their condition (P<0.001).<h4>Conclusion</h4>The results from this trial support patient satisfaction and acceptability of point-of-care testing in a general practice setting.
Keywords: general practice
patients
point-of-care systems
satisfaction.
Rights: © British Journal of General Practice, 2010.
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp10X483508
Published version: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2828863/?report=abstract
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
General Practice publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.