Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/64885
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Type: | Journal article |
Title: | Comparison of two-equation turbulence models in simulation of a non-swirl coal flame in a pilot-scale furnace |
Author: | Tian, Z. Witt, P. Schwarz, M. Yang, W. |
Citation: | Combustion Science and Technology, 2009; 181(7):954-983 |
Publisher: | Taylor & Francis Ltd |
Issue Date: | 2009 |
ISSN: | 0010-2202 1563-521X |
Statement of Responsibility: | Z. F. Tian, P. J. Witt, M. P. Schwarz, and W. Yang |
Abstract: | The capability of six two-equation Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models for simulation of a non-swirl coal flame in a pilot-scale furnace has been investigated. These turbulence models—the standard k-ε model, re-normalization group (RNG) k-ε model, modified k-ε model, Wilcox k-ω model, Menter k-ω model (also called BSL model), and Shear-stress transport (SST) model—are assessed with the use of measured gas phase velocity, temperature, oxygen, and carbon dioxide volume fraction data from the literature. Predictions of the standard k-ε model, RNG k-ε model, BSL, and SST model are generally in good agreement with the experimental data. The Wilcox k-ω model generally overpredicts O2 volume fraction and underpredicts CO2 volume fraction. The modified k-ε model yields results that have large discrepancies from measurements. |
Keywords: | CFD Coal combustion Non-swirl flame Two-equation turbulence model |
Rights: | Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC |
DOI: | 10.1080/00102200902925679 |
Published version: | http://proxy.library.adelaide.edu.au/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=iih&AN=43002596&site=ehost-live&scope=site |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest Mechanical Engineering publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.