Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/65716
Type: Conference paper
Title: Learning overhypotheses
Author: Kemp, C.
Perfors, A.
Tenenbaum, J.
Citation: Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2006) / R. Sun and N. Miyake (eds.), 26-29 July, 2006; pp.417-422
Publisher: Cognitive Science Society
Publisher Place: United States
Issue Date: 2006
ISBN: 0976831821
Conference Name: Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (28th : 2006 : Vancouver, Canada)
Statement of
Responsibility: 
Charles Kemp, Amy Perfors and Joshua B. Tenenbaum
Abstract: Inductive learning is impossible without overhypothe-ses, or constraints on the hypotheses considered by the learner. Some of these overhypotheses must be innate, but we suggest that hierarchical Bayesian models help explain how the rest can be acquired. The hierarchi-cal approach also addresses a common question about Bayesian models of cognition: where do the priors come from? To illustrate our claims, we consider two specific kinds of overhypotheses — overhypotheses about fea-ture variability (e.g. the shape bias in word learning) and overhypotheses about the grouping of categories into on-tological kinds like objects and substances.
Rights: © the authors
Published version: http://csjarchive.cogsci.rpi.edu/Proceedings/2006/docs/p417.pdf
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 5
Psychology publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_65716.pdfPublished version214.28 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.