Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/71807
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVerma, A.-
dc.contributor.authorSanders, P.-
dc.contributor.authorMacLe, L.-
dc.contributor.authorChampagne, C.-
dc.contributor.authorNair, G.-
dc.contributor.authorCalkins, C.-
dc.contributor.authorWilber, D.-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2011; 22(5):541-547-
dc.identifier.issn1045-3873-
dc.identifier.issn1540-8167-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/71807-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Adjuvant ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) likely improves procedural outcome compared to PVI alone, particularly in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, CFAE regions can be extensive, occasionally requiring a large amount of extra ablation. Some CFAE regions may also represent passive wavefront collision and may not require ablation. Thus, there is interest in identifying more selective CFAE sites that are critical to AF perpetuation, minimizing the amount of adjuvant ablation that must be performed. Objective: The SELECT AF study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial comparing a strategy of PVI plus generalized CFAE ablation versus a strategy of PVI plus selective CFAE ablation, focusing on regions of continuous electrical activity (CEA). The primary efficacy endpoint is freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 1 year and the primary safety endpoint is total radiofrequency (RF) delivery time per procedure. Methods: Patients undergoing a first time ablation procedure for symptomatic persistent AF will be included. Patients with permanent AF or with left atrial size ≥55 mm will be excluded. Patients will all receive PVI at the time of their ablation, but will be randomized 1:1 to receive adjuvant CFAE ablation using the traditional “generalized” approach, or a “selective” approach targeting only CEA regions. Both strategies will be guided by automated mapping algorithms. This study will enroll a minimum of 80 evaluable subjects; 40 in each randomization group. Conclusions: SELECT AF is a randomized trial in patients with persistent AF to evaluate the efficacy of selective versus generalized CFAE ablation in addition to traditional PVI.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityAtul Verma, Prashanthan Sanders, Laurent Macle, Jean Champagne, Girish M. Nair, Hugh Calkins, and David J. Wilber-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherFutura Publ Co-
dc.rights© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01959.x-
dc.subjectatrial fibrillation-
dc.subjectclinical trial-
dc.subjectcomplex fractionated atrial electrograms-
dc.subjectelectroanatomical mapping-
dc.subjectleft atrium-
dc.subjectradiofrequency ablation-
dc.titleSelective CFAE targeting for Atrial Fibrillation Study (SELECT AF): Clinical rationale, design, and implementation-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01959.x-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidSanders, P. [0000-0003-3803-8429]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest
Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.