Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/79134
Citations
Scopus Web of Science® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, N.-
dc.contributor.authorKortschak, R.-
dc.contributor.authorParker, W.-
dc.contributor.authorSchreiber, A.-
dc.contributor.authorBranford, S.-
dc.contributor.authorScott, H.-
dc.contributor.authorGlonek, G.-
dc.contributor.authorAdelson, D.-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationBioinformatics, 2013; 29(18):2223-2230-
dc.identifier.issn1367-4803-
dc.identifier.issn1460-2059-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/79134-
dc.description.abstractMotivation: With the advent of relatively affordable high-throughput technologies, DNA sequencing of cancers is now common practice in cancer research projects and will be increasingly used in clinical practice to inform diagnosis and treatment. Somatic (cancer-only) single nucleotide variants (SNVs) are the simplest class of mutation, yet their identification in DNA sequencing data is confounded by germline polymorphisms, tumour heterogeneity and sequencing and analysis errors. Four recently published algorithms for the detection of somatic SNV sites in matched cancer–normal sequencing datasets are VarScan, SomaticSniper, JointSNVMix and Strelka. In this analysis, we apply these four SNV calling algorithms to cancer–normal Illumina exome sequencing of a chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patient. The candidate SNV sites returned by each algorithm are filtered to remove likely false positives, then characterized and compared to investigate the strengths and weaknesses of each SNV calling algorithm. Results: Comparing the candidate SNV sets returned by VarScan, SomaticSniper, JointSNVMix2 and Strelka revealed substantial differences with respect to the number and character of sites returned; the somatic probability scores assigned to the same sites; their susceptibility to various sources of noise; and their sensitivities to low-allelic-fraction candidates.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityNicola D. Roberts, R. Daniel Kortschak, Wendy T. Parker, Andreas W. Schreiber, Susan Branford, Hamish S. Scott, Garique Glonek and David L. Adelson-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherOxford Univ Press-
dc.rights© The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.-
dc.source.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt375-
dc.subjectHumans-
dc.subjectNeoplasms-
dc.subjectSequence Analysis, DNA-
dc.subjectMutation-
dc.subjectAlgorithms-
dc.subjectSoftware-
dc.subjectGenotyping Techniques-
dc.subjectExome-
dc.titleA comparative analysis of algorithms for somatic SNV detection in cancer-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/bioinformatics/btt375-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidKortschak, R. [0000-0001-8295-2301]-
dc.identifier.orcidSchreiber, A. [0000-0002-9081-3405]-
dc.identifier.orcidBranford, S. [0000-0002-1964-3626] [0000-0002-5095-7981]-
dc.identifier.orcidScott, H. [0000-0002-5813-631X]-
dc.identifier.orcidAdelson, D. [0000-0003-2404-5636]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 4
Environment Institute publications
Molecular and Biomedical Science publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hdl_79134.pdfPublished version796.44 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.