Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/8335
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Type: | Journal article |
Title: | The birth interval hypothesis - does it really indicate the end of the primipaternity hypothesis |
Author: | Dekker, G. Robillard, P. |
Citation: | Journal of Reproductive Immunology, 2003; 59(2):245-251 |
Publisher: | Elsevier Sci Ireland Ltd |
Issue Date: | 2003 |
ISSN: | 0165-0378 1872-7603 |
Statement of Responsibility: | Gus Dekker, and Pierre-Yves Robillard |
Abstract: | Recent Norwegian data suggest the presence of a causal relationship between prolonged birth intervals and the risk for preeclampsia in subsequent pregnancies. It has been proposed that the birth interval data explain the known association between a change in paternity and the risk for preeclampsia. In this review, the authors explore alternative explanations for the Norwegian findings, and as such argue that there is currently no reason to reject the primipaternity hypothesis. |
Keywords: | Birth interval hypothesis Primipaternity hypothesis Preeclampsia |
Description: | Copyright © 2003 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0165-0378(03)00051-2 |
Published version: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01650378 |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest Obstetrics and Gynaecology publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.