Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2440/93100
Citations
Scopus Web of ScienceĀ® Altmetric
?
?
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFarshid, G.-
dc.contributor.authorSullivan, T.-
dc.contributor.authorJones, S.-
dc.contributor.authorRoder, D.-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationAsian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention (APJCP), 2014; 15(24):10665-10673-
dc.identifier.issn1513-7368-
dc.identifier.issn2476-762X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2440/93100-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: We wished to analyse patterns of use of needle biopsy procedures by BreastScreen Australia (BSA) accredited programs to identify areas for improvement. DESIGN: BSA services provided anonymous data regarding percutaneous needle biopsy of screen detected lesions assessed between 2005-2009. RESULTS: 12 services, from 5 of 7 Australian states and territories provided data for 18212 lesions biopsied. Preoperative diagnosis rates were 96.84% for lesion other than microcalcification (LOTM) and 93.21% for microcalcifications. At surgery 97.9% impalpable lesions were removed at the first procedure. Of 11548 Microcalcification (LOTM) biopsied, 46.9% were malignant. The final diagnosis was reached by conventional core biopsy (CCB) in 72.46%, FNAB in 21.33%, VACB in 1.69% and open biopsy in 4.52% of lesions. FNA is being limited to LOTM with benign imaging After FNAB, core biopsy was required for 38% of LOTM. In LOTM the mean false positive rate (FPR) was 0.36% for FNAB, 0.06% for NCB and 0% for VACB. Diagnostic accuracy was 72.75% for FNAB and 92.1% for core biopsies combined. Of 6441 microcalcifications biopsied 2305 (35.8%) were malignant. Microcalcifications are being assessed primarily by NCB but 6.57% underwent FNAB, 45.6% of which required NCB. False positive diagnoses were rare. FNR was 5% for NCB and 1.53% for VACB. Diagnostic accuracy was 73.52% for FNAB, 86.29% for NCB and 88.63% for VACB. Only 8 of 12 services had access to VACB facilities. CONCLUSIONS: BSA services are selecting lesions effectively for biopsy and are achieving high preoperative diagnosis rates. Gaps in the present accreditation standards require further consideration.-
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityGelareh Farshid, Thomas Sullivan, Simeon Jones, David Roder-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherAsian Pacific Organization for Cancer Prevention-
dc.rightsCopyright status unknown-
dc.source.urihttp://koreascience.or.kr/article/ArticleFullRecord.jsp?cn=POCPA9_2015_v15n24_10665&ordernum=20-
dc.subjectBreast cancer; screening; mammography; needle biopsy-
dc.titlePerformance indices of needle biopsy procedures for the assessment of screen detected abnormalities in services accredited by breastscreen Australia-
dc.typeJournal article-
dc.identifier.doi10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.24.10665-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
dc.identifier.orcidFarshid, G. [0000-0002-2056-0561]-
dc.identifier.orcidRoder, D. [0000-0001-6442-4409]-
Appears in Collections:Aurora harvest 2
Medicine publications

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.